A fine for the Australian branch of Samsung warns that the water resistance of phones has its limits | mobilenet.cz | TechBuzz

- Advertisement -


The water resistance of phones has been a controversial topic since this feature began to gain ground. Paradoxically, this contributed to the fact that many more phones “drowned” than in times when they did not have such protection and everyone kept them as far away from the water as possible. There are now many mistakes, myths and superstitions among users about what their phone can handle. For example, such the most common degree of protection IP68 – by definition, such a device can handle immersion to a depth of 1.5 meters for up to 30 minutes. It may seem like a lot, but the devil is in the details: the water must be sweet, without added chemicals and the immersion is done very slowly and carefully.

Read also

GLOSS: I like water, but I’m ashamed of it

The rational approach is to take IP68 as a last resort in case of contact with the liquid, not as a challenge for water games in a pool with chlorinated water or even in the sea. Sadly, however, marketing departments from various manufacturers often directly encourage such actions. This has also been the subject of a dispute between ACCC, the Australian Consumer Protection Agency, and Samsung’s subsidiary there. Specifically, there were nine different advertisements published on social networks and websites. They show the use of telephones in swimming pools or at sea when, for example, they encourage them to take underwater selfie.

Samsung Galaxy S8
Asterisks in the texts of advertisements are a common scandal, even on the other side of the world.
- Advertisement -

However, aggressive chemicals used in swimming pools or sea salt can very easily cause corrosion of some parts, especially the charging port, which then does not work properly. This was a frequent subject of user complaints to the commission, which later began to address the issue. The result is a fine for Samsung of 14 million Australian dollars (about 227 million crowns). Specifically, because he lied about the properties of his products in his advertisements. These were the Samsung Galaxy S7, S7 Edge, A5 (2017), A7 (2017), S8, S8 Plus and Note 8. More than 3.1 million of these Galaxy phones were sold in Australia between 2016 and 2018.

The case is a warning not only for various marketing departments, but also for the users themselves, especially before the summer season of holidays and stays by the water. If you plan to have your device come in contact with liquid, there is no additional protection.

- Advertisement -



Source link

- Advertisement -
Admin
Adminhttp://techbuzz.asia
I am admin of techbuzz.asia blog & I provide tech-related news. As a part of my hobby, I make content related to technology and gadgets reviews too. I love to be a content creator apart from it, I am a full-time employee in an MNC company and manage blogs systematically. You can mail me at [email protected]

More from author

Related posts

Advertisment

Latest posts

Kingsman 3: start of filming in 2023? | TechBuzz

Director Matthew Vaughn's third Kingsman movie is set to conclude the story arc of character Gary "Eggsy" Unwin, aka Galahad, played by Taron Egerton....

Revolution from Revuto: Lifetime subscriptions to Netflix and Spotify available to users for the first time | TechBuzz

By using advanced technology, Revuto by selling NFT enables users to have a lifetime subscription to their favorite streaming services with a stable price...

Want to stay up to date with the latest news?

We would love to hear from you! Please fill in your details and we will stay in touch. It's that simple!